The image below has been posted on the site - accessible only to members - since last February. Today it was removed, citing the rule against the "non-flaccid" penis.
Censorship is alive and well.
Shot digitally with a one-light source, sepia toned.
COPYRIGHT © FOTO-GRAPHOS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PHOTOGRAPHS BY foto-GRAPHOS ARE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW. NO IMAGE MAY BE USED, EDITED, REPRODUCED, TRANSFERRED, PUBLISHED OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ARTIST. THIS SITE CONTAINS FINE ART PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES OF MALE NUDITY AND MAY BE INAPPROPRIATE FOR SOME VIEWERS.
Sunday, November 27, 2011
A small rant
I am a paying member of an on-line site that provides exposure and a clearing house of sorts for models and photographers. The site is called (unfortunately) Model Mayhem.
The image below has been posted on the site - accessible only to members - since last February. Today it was removed, citing the rule against the "non-flaccid" penis.
Censorship is alive and well.
The image below has been posted on the site - accessible only to members - since last February. Today it was removed, citing the rule against the "non-flaccid" penis.
Censorship is alive and well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree about the unlikeable name of the sight...I do not agree with the sites rule about only "totaly Flacid penis images" When you can have an just open vigina in a shoot but not a penis in different states of blood flow, then it is a one sided view of what is what on MM. Too bad they are not even with what is called "too much"
ReplyDeleteMichael
Pride of Paradise